Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
+678%
8.397 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
GF100
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
