Intel Arc Pro A60 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2050MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
+194%
8.397 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc Pro A60
+107%
7385
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
3566
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc Pro A60
+125%
3623
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
1607
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
