Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FirePro W8000

Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60 +160%
8.397 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy