Intel Arc Pro A60 vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60
+245%
8.397 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
131.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
262.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
16.79 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.397 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
269 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
