Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50
+1689%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
640MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
320bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
28
32
ROPs
20
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
