Intel Arc Pro A50 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50
+526%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Turks
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
