Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2000MHz vs 1177MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+47%
6.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
8
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
