Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2000MHz vs 1680MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation
+698%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
1024
Shading Units
9728
64
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
8
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
AD103
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
