Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (2115MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+217%
12.99 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc Pro A30M
378
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
+727%
3128
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
8
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
