Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
+1606%
4.096 TFLOPS
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
