Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 115% (2000MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M
+145%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc Pro A30M
+130%
378
GeForce MX450 25W
164
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Aug 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
720 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.76 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.08 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.333 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.667 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
