Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 28W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
+1418%
1.382 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.765 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1382 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
28W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
