Intel Arc Graphics 32EU vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 32EU and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1950MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 32EU
+36%
0.998 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
31.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
1.997 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
998.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
32 nm
17.8 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
243 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
