Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 28W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile +4963%
4.608 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

72.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
144.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
9.216 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy