Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2200MHz vs 1500MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+242%
3.942 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP
1.152 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2020
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.00 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.304 TFLOPS
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1152 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Renoir
-
-
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
9.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
