Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2200MHz vs 1150MHz)
576 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+435%
3.942 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
320
56
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
-
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
