Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Intel Arc 140V
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2200MHz vs 2050MHz)
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
3.942 TFLOPS
Intel Arc 140V
+4%
4.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Sep 2024
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Battlemage
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
MHz
Memory
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
LPDDR5x
Memory Bus
64bit
Bandwidth
GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
0
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.6 GPixel/s
123.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
7.885 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
3.942 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.1 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
-
Power Connectors
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
-
GPU Variant
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Xe2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12.2
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
