Intel Arc B580 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc B580 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc B580 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2670MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (456.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 190W)
Score
Graphics Card
Dec 2024
Release Date
Jul 2005
Battlemage
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2670 MHz
Base Clock
-
2670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
456.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
12
80
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
18 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
213.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
427.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
27.34 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
190W
TDP
83W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
BMG-G21
GPU Name
NV41
SRPMF
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Xe2
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
19.6 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
272 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
