Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+2246%
18.02 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
