Intel Arc A780 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+12413%
18.02 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
200W
TDP
73W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
