Intel Arc A770 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
2
128
ROPs
2
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
VSA-101
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
180 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
-
