Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2004
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
NV43
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
110 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
