Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 225W)
Score
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jul 2005
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
-
256
TMUs
12
128
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
83W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
NV41
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
