Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+19560%
19.66 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF119
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
