Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2656 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+875%
19.66 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1440
256
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
