Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro W4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+1451%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2012
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
