Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro S9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+275%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170
5.238 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jul 2015
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
176
128
ROPs
64
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
