Intel Arc A770 vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2400MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+539%
19.66 TFLOPS
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A770
+318%
13560
Arc A350
3239
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A770
+340%
6525
Arc A350
1481
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2022
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
24
512
Tensor Cores
96
32
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
DG2-128
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
