Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A750
+2785%
17.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
28
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
