Intel Arc A730M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc A730M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1594MHz vs 1100MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A730M
+452%
6.758 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A730M
+606%
7485
GeForce MX330
1060
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A730M
+3125%
4064
GeForce MX330
126
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
6.758 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
80W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP108
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
