Intel Arc A580 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (2000MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A580
+548%
12.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Feb 2014
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1700 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
