Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A580 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

Intel Arc A580 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Boost Clock2000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A580
12.29 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000 +26%
15.56 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1700 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
4096
192
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
256
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net