Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A580
+924%
12.29 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
175W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
