Intel Arc A580 vs ATI FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A580
+1882%
12.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
400
192
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Redwood
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
