Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A550M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Intel Arc A550M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A550M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (2010MHz vs 900MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A550M
3.686 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +179%
10.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
2560
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
16
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
115.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
160.8 GTexel/s
7.373 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.29 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
160.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy