Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (2000MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380M
+66%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1550 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
