Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2050MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380 +47%
4.198 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jul 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy