Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A380
+10664%
4.198 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A380
+1400%
4277
GeForce 210
285
Graphics Card
Jun 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
