Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 256MB VRAM GeForce Go 6800 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 89W)
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Feb 2005
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce Go 6
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
12
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
89W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
NV41
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GO6800 U
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
