Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs AMD FirePro M8900

Intel Arc A350M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +35%
1.766 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
768
Shading Units
960
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Blackcomb
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy