Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2250MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +650%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2020
Alchemist
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Navi 21
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy