Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A350
+518%
3.072 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV670
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
