Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 111% (2000MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +10%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy