Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1750MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+145%
2.688 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
