Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+5873%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G96C
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
