Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+700%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
112
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
