Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+3260%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
17W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Cedar
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
