Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 159W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+510%
2.688 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
