Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1750MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+369%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
768
Shading Units
4480
32
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
96
Tensor Cores
280
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GA100
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
