Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 16EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 16EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 213% (2350MHz vs 750MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+2406%
4.813 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 16EU
0.192 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc 140T Mobile
+1211%
4012
UHD Graphics 16EU
306
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc 140T Mobile
+1279%
1986
UHD Graphics 16EU
144
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2021
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
750 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
384.0 GFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Jasper Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Generation 11.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm+
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
